Skip to content

ZeroBlockers vs Double Diamond

Delivery should be able to change the solution.

A clear map for finding the problem and the solution

The Double Diamond has four stages: Discover, Define, Develop and Deliver. Teams explore a problem, pick one to solve, try several solutions, and keep the one that works. The Design Council also includes small tests in the framework which allows for going back to earlier stages.

The Design Council’s Double Diamond. A challenge goes through Discover and Define, which explore and pick the problem, then Develop and Deliver, which explore and pick the solution, and ends in an outcome. Teams go back to earlier stages as they learn.

Delivery cannot change the signed-off solution

The Design Council expects teams to go back to earlier stages, but it does not say who funds or approves that, or who builds the result. So organizations use the project process they already have.

The chosen solution is signed off at the end of the second diamond and handed to a delivery team with a budget for that design. When building and releasing show a better answer, changing it needs a change request. The model also maps one challenge at a time, and leaves open how other teams and the rest of the business work with the result.

The Double Diamond: Discover and Define explore and pick the problem, Develop and Deliver explore and pick the solution. Many organizations sign off the solution at the end of the second diamond and hand it to a delivery team, which builds and releases it past the end of the Double Diamond. A better solution found during delivery needs a change request.

The same diamonds, with delivery in the same team

Who carries the work from idea to satisfied customer

Double Diamond

  • Strategy and fundingLeft to the organization
  • Discover the problem to Test solutionsDesign team
  • Build to Run and measureLeft to the organization

ZeroBlockers

“A delivery team will not explore widely enough.”

Designers will say that the first diamond needs room to diverge. A team that also owns delivery feels pressure to ship, so it narrows to a problem too quickly and explores only what it already knows. A dedicated discovery phase protects that time.

The risk is real. ZeroBlockers answers it with research that sits in every week of the team’s schedule, limits on work in progress so delivery cannot crowd research out, and Enabling Teams that coach the team on wider exploration. Where a problem is so new that no team owns it yet, a separate piece of exploration can make sense. Once a team owns the area, going back to the problem is part of its job.

How the approaches differ

The differences explained

Signing off the solution freezes it before delivery starts

The Design Council’s Framework for Innovation handles going back well while a team is still looking for a solution. Small tests can send the team back to an earlier stage, and solutions that do not work get thrown out. The framework ends once a solution is agreed, so it does not cover building and releasing it, or who funds that work and approves a change of direction.

So organizations use the project process they already have. The agreed solution is signed off at the end of the second diamond, becomes an approved scope with a budget, and goes to a delivery team funded to build it. Yet building and releasing are where a team learns most about how a solution works for customers. Going back now means a formal change request against a finished stage, and the funding rules punish every step backward.

ZeroBlockers removes the solution sign-off. Money goes to a part of the customer journey, and the Product Team, the leadership group for the product, reviews evidence and decisions every week. A team goes back to its assumptions when the findings call for it and tells leaders what it decided. Only high-risk decisions and commitments outside the team’s scope go up for approval.

Going back to discovery needs a team that still exists

When discovery is run as a project, it ends when the design is signed off and handed over. If building or a live test then shows the design misses, the people who did the research have already moved on. Someone has to find a new budget and staff a new team to look again.

ZeroBlockers funds a persistent Stream Team, a small team that owns one part of the customer journey. The same people research, build, run the service, and check the results. When the solution needs a second look, they are still there to take it.

The Product Team reviews the investment each quarter and can redirect or stop it when the opportunity no longer holds up.

Exploration needs a decision at the end

A team that keeps exploring forever wastes as much time as one that picks the wrong answer too early. ZeroBlockers limits work in progress. Each test should answer one question, and the team says up front which decision the answer will settle.

The Product Team pushes back on research that never changes a decision, just as it pushes back on features that never change a customer result. The Weekly Product Review covers the decisions the team made, without walking through every research activity.

Sources and comparison scope

Reviewed September 2026. This page compares ZeroBlockers with Double Diamond as documented, with attributed practitioner accounts where available. Descriptions of Double Diamond follow its published guidance. Claims about common practice are attributed where they come from a named source. Other statements about what organizations typically do are our analysis. The worked example is our analysis and reports no measured results.